The Vinland Map :: History Papers

The Vinland Map is believed to predate Christopher Columbus expedition by almost 50 years as it has realistic cartography of the island of Vinland, thought to be a part of Canada or even Northeastern America. The part could potentially bid evidence that the Norse explorers were the first Europeans to visit America and map it. However, thither is doubt surrounding the origins and age of the map. These issues convey divided scientists into two groups use to proving the authenticity or lack thereof of the map. Recent research has apply several chemical analyses which impart examined specifically the newsprint and the ink set out on the map. The most recent methods used to test the map have been carbon dating and Raman spectroscopy. It is thought that the map was written on paper which has origins in pre-Columbus days. However, several analyses of the ink have revealed the presence of anatase, a organize of TiO 2, which was not developed until the first part of the 20 th Centu ry. This clear would contradict the evidence that the paper is authentic. However, these two claims do not needs contradict one another.A recent theory is that the fleece was recovered(p) from an earlier work and then a forger used advanced(a) ink to draw a fake map. Carbon-14 dating has put the origins of the parchment to the mid 1400s. It is very hard to come to a definitive close from the available evidence as both sides offer strong arguments. In my own opinion, the map is much likely authentic than a forgery. However, the disceptation surrounding the map has not yet been settled. The Vinland Map has been at the warmheartedness of controversy ever since it appeared around 1957. It depicts several islands in the Atlantic Ocean, unless more importantly, an island called Vinland. This island is believed to be part of Canada or even Northeastern America. If the map is truly genuine, then it pre-dates Columbus discovery of America by more than 50 years (Gorman, 2002). Howev er, there has been constant doubt surrounding its origins and authenticity. These issues have divided scientists into two camps which seem to ride circles around one another. As soon as new evidence arises, someone disputes it with counterarguments that are but as strong. The controversy has focused most recently on two issues the ink used to draw the map, and the parchment that it is drawn upon.