New Law :: essays research papers

CBS) Attorney General John Ashcroft denounced Tuesdays Supreme Court persuasion that disquieted a law banning computer simulations and other fool-the-eye depictions of teen-agers or fryren having sex, say it would make prosecutions more difficult.Where doable, he said, the judge Department provide reconstitute prosecutions it has brought to pursue "general obscenity charges against those who have victimized youngsterren."Child pornographers "will find little refuge" in the decision, he said. "We will broaden to use whatever resources we can to identify and prosecute child carbon black cases to the fullest extent of the law."Ashcroft also said that he was eager to work with sex act to revise the law.Youthful sexuality is an old theme in art, from Shakespeare to academy Award-winning movies, the court found in striking down the 1996 child pornography law on free speech grounds.The law would impose into question legitimate educational, scientific or artistic depictions of youthful sex, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote for a 6-3 majority."The statute proscribes the visual depiction of an idea that of teen-agers engaging in sexual activity that is a fact of modern society and has been a theme in art and literature throughout the ages," Kennedy wrote in a decision joined by four other justices. Clarence Thomas, one of the courts some conservative justices, wrote a separate opinion agreeing with the outcome.The court invalidated ii provisions of the Child Pornography Prevention Act as too broad and unconstitutional. Free speech advocates and pornographers had challenged the laws ban on material that "appears to be" a child in a sexually explicit accompaniment or that is advertised to convey the impression that someone under 18 is involved.Another section of the law was not challenged, and remains in force. It bans prurient computer alteration of innocent images of children, such as the grafting of a childs sc hool picture onto a naked body.CBS News Correspondent bobtail Orr reports the adult entertainment industry, which led the challenge, hailed the decision as a success for free speech."The creators of art who can now safely deal with the main(prenominal) topic of teenage sexuality without fear of the most severe possible government sanctions," said Jeffery Douglas of the Free Speech Coalition.Justices John Paul Stevens, David H. Souter, pathos Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer signed Kennedys opinion. Thomas, in a separate concurring opinion, said the courts ruling appropriately strikes down a ban that was too sweeping barely leaves a window for future regulation of some kinds of virtual child pornography.