Difference Between General Perspectives :: essays research papers

What is the difference between the superior general perspectives? How does the work of Ritzer attempt to reduce this problem?Micro theories examine the processes of face-to-face contact among individuals and personal points-of-view in society whereas, the macro theories deal with large-scale social events of society - center things that have public concern.The theories that argon apart of the little-level are symbolic interactionism, dramaturgy, ethnomethodology, and veer supposition. Symbolic interaction is an individual-based theory that uses constructed symbols, much(prenominal) as language and gestures, to which populate give meaning in their everyday interactions. Dramaturgy, best stated by Goffman (1959), is what actors portray on a the theatrical stage is similar to the behavior people act in society. Ethnomethodology is basic common-sense used in for general situations in everyday life (Ritzer, 77). Exchange theory is a habituated relationship is found to be attrac tive whereas the rewards tend to outweigh punishment (Blau, 1964).Structural functionalism and conflict theory are two types of macro-theories. Structural functionalism (Perrucci, 1983) has lead main ideas 1) society is a system containing interdependent and interacting parts saltation together in time and space, 2) shared values among members of the system are social glue that helps hold it together, 3) and systems have a need for perceptual constancy and therefor attempt the parts working together harmoniously. Conflict theory is the belief that society contains basic inequalities in wealth, power, and prestige (Coser, 1967 Dahrendorf, 1959).Ritzer, like galore(postnominal) other sociologists, wants to disintegrate the split between the micro and macro sociology. Ritzer attempts to do this by adding on to Gurvitchs insights . Ritzer views the micro-macro issue, not by subjective-objective continuum, but the phenomena as subjective or objective therefore, concluding that there a re quartette major levels of analysis (See Table I) that are a product of dialectic interrelationships (Ritzer, 1996).Table I - Ritzers Major Levels of Social Analysis macroscopicI. Macro-objectiveExamples - society, law, bureaucracy, architecture, technology, and languageII. Macro-subjectiveExamples- culture, norms, and valuesIII. Micro-objectiveExamples - patterns of behavior, action, and interactionIV. Micro-subjectiveExamples - perceptions, beliefs the various facets of the social construction of truthMICROSCOPICIn row 1, the macro-objective, involves the large-scale basic standards and material realities (Ritzer, 359) by which the general populous abides by whereas as the macro-subjective is the large-scale intangible ideals such as norms and values which shape our everyday lives. In row 2, the micro theories also have the objective and subjective consistencies but on a smaller scale.